{"id":18021,"date":"2024-11-21T00:28:44","date_gmt":"2024-11-21T00:28:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gpt.m2mbeta.com\/?p=18021"},"modified":"2024-11-21T00:28:44","modified_gmt":"2024-11-21T00:28:44","slug":"captain-toms-family-repeatedly-made-money-from-charity-inquiry-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gpt.m2mbeta.com\/?p=18021","title":{"rendered":"–\tCaptain Tom's family repeatedly made money from charity, inquiry finds"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\"GettyGetty Images<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Captain Sir Tom Moore said at the time that writing his memoir was an opportunity to raise more money for charity in his name<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n
\n

The family of renowned pandemic fundraiser Captain Sir Tom Moore damaged public trust in charities by refusing to donate any of the \u00a31.4m received from his book deal, a long-awaited report has found.<\/p>\n

The Charity Commission said his daughter and son-in-law displayed a “pattern of behaviour” in which they benefitted personally from the Captain Tom Foundation and people “would understandably feel misled”.<\/p>\n

The World War Two veteran became a household name during the first Covid-19 lockdown, by walking up and down his driveway in Marston Moretaine<\/a>, Bedfordshire.<\/p>\n

The \u00a338.9m raised by Capt Sir Tom for NHS Charities Together, as a result of his efforts, did not form part of the commission’s inquiry, and all of that sum went to NHS charities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

‘Misconduct and mismanagement’<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
\n

“The charity set up in his name has not lived up to that legacy of others before self,” said Charity Commission chief executive David Holdsworth.<\/p>\n

“The public \u2013 and the law \u2013 rightly expect those involved in charities to make an unambiguous distinction between their personal interests, and those of the charity and the beneficiaries they are there to serve.”<\/p>\n

Mr Holdsworth said there were repeated instances of a “blurring of boundaries between private and charitable interests” and that Hannah and Colin Ingram-Moore benefitted significantly.<\/p>\n

“Together the failings amount to misconduct and-or mismanagement,” he said.<\/p>\n

He added its report had found “repeated failures of governance and integrity”, and that its inquiry had been fair, balanced and independent.<\/p>\n

In July 2023, the Captain Tom Foundation announced it was not actively seeking donations<\/a> or making payments, but the foundation has not been closed down.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\"InstagramInstagram<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Hannah and Colin Ingram-Moore laid a wreath earlier this month at the Burma Star Memorial in Staffordshire<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n
\n

The Captain Tom Foundation was registered as a grant-making charity two months after the veteran’s walk began, and celebrities including Sir David Beckham and Dame Judy Dench later helped to promote its various fundraisers.<\/p>\n

The father-of-two died aged 100 in February 2021<\/a>, with coronavirus.<\/p>\n

His son-in-law Mr Ingram-Moore became a trustee of the foundation that same month, and Sir Capt Tom’s daughter – Mrs Ingram-Moore – became interim chief executive later that year.<\/p>\n

The couple\u2019s roles came into question in June 2022, when the commission launched a statutory inquiry<\/a> to determine if they had benefitted privately at the charity\u2019s expense.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The books<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\"AndyAndy Meeson\/BBC<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The family’s private company was paid an advance of \u00a31.47m for Capt Sir Tom\u2019s three books<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n
\n

The regulator\u2019s findings showed that Club Nook, a private firm set up by the Ingram-Moores in April 2020, was paid an advance of \u00a31.47m for Sir Capt Tom\u2019s three books, including his best-selling autobiography, Tomorrow Will be a Good Day.<\/p>\n

The publisher Penguin, and promoter Carver PR, said the family gave repeated assurances that part of the advance would be used to set up and fund the foundation.<\/p>\n

In addition, a press release, various marketing materials and the prologue of Sir Capt Sir Tom\u2019s memoir, all stated that the books would be used to support or raise money for the foundation.<\/p>\n

However, to date the charity has not received any money from the publishing agreement.<\/p>\n

In 2022, the commission said the inquiry twice asked Mr and Mrs Ingram-Moore to “rectify matters by making a donation to charity” but “on both occasions they declined”.<\/p>\n

The publications were “a purely commercial endeavour” and “had damaged public trust” in charities, the report concluded.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Virgin Media O2 awards<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\"GettyGetty Images<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Mrs Ingram-Moore was on a salary of \u00a385,000 as interim chief executive when she acted as a judge at an awards ceremony bearing the charity’s branding<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n
\n

Between 2020 and 2021, Capt Sir Tom acted as a judge for the Virgin Media Local Legends Awards and was personally paid \u00a310,000.<\/p>\n

The following year, his daughter was approached to be a judge and signed an ambassador agreement with Virgin Media O2 while chief executive of the Captain Tom Foundation, for which she was paid \u00a318,000.<\/p>\n

The subsequent Virgin Media O2 Captain Tom Foundation Connector Awards included the charity’s logo on its awards plaque<\/a>.<\/p>\n

She had already been made interim chief executive at the charity, on an annual salary of \u00a385,000.<\/p>\n

However, the report said there was no record that she informed the charity trustees when she entered into the financial arrangement with Virgin Media.<\/p>\n

The commission said it did not agree with Mrs Ingram-Moore\u2019s assertion the work was undertaken in a personal capacity. <\/p>\n

It found this created a conflict of interest, and her failure to avoid or manage this situation “amounted to misconduct and-or mismanagement”, adding this also meant the payment she received was an “unauthorised benefit” to her husband, who was a trustee at the time.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The spa complex<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\"GettyGetty Images<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Bedford Borough Council forced the Ingram-Moores to tear the spa building down in February<\/figcaption><\/p>\n<\/figure>\n
\n

In 2021, the Ingram-Moores received approval from the council to build a Captain Tom Foundation building beside their home, after referencing the charity\u2019s name and number “numerous times” in the planning application.<\/p>\n

However, the resulting building, which contained a spa pool and home cinema, was described by council enforcement officer Richard Proctor as “wholly unauthorised” and the family was forced to demolish it in February<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Charity Commission found the couple failed to consult the trustees about the spa complex, which suggested “they were using the charity and its name inappropriately for their private benefit”.<\/p>\n

The Ingram-Moores told the inquiry the inclusion of the charity\u2019s name in the initial planning application was an error, claiming they were busy with “global media work” at the time, but they did intend to use the building for charitable purposes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Six-figure salary<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
\n

Other findings contained in the report showed:<\/p>\n